I am generally a patient person. Recently, however, I have grown tired and impatient with my fellow Egyptian sisters who demonstrate to me how few of them are able to slip out of the noose of injustice wrapped around their collective necks.
I often marvel at the number of mothers, daughters, and sisters who talk about what they deserve as a right yet revel in playing the damsel in distress. They blame their inability to achieve what they want on the unchallenged authority of the men in their family. I believe that where there's a will, there's a way. Think of yourself as a victim and you will always be one. We make our own dreams; we set our own goals. We know our strengths and our shortcomings. Anyone can do anything if they set their mind to it. I have done this time and time again. I am not special nor are the other strong women I know. Overcoming the traumas we experience in our life is part of living. Victory doesn't come in just one flavour. Defeat is only momentary. It is fear of defeat and thus the lack of trying that keeps those women subdued.
At best, the Egyptian Jane (or Laila, as many would like to refer to her) seems lost and confused. At worst, she is being misled by a variety of women's movements and groups who claim to support women but do very little for them. I can't say that they are all evil, and I realize that I am not obligated to help but I actually believe in women's rights and if those organizations can manage to bring about change then I want to do my part to make that dream come true. Still, I have been told that such groups won't affect much because they don't even know what they want. At first I thought that as the case with any cause when it starts, there is a lot of vagueness and a general direction without a focused mission. I thought that perhaps with time, things will become clear. Unfortunately, some of those groups have been around for a while without any indication that they have come any closer to figuring out what their goals are and how to achieve them.
After much thought, I have come to believe that in this case, time is not a factor. We have people who are leading those movements into a sort of regression without even realizing it. For instance, many of them call for freedom and equality between women and men. Their actions, however, speak louder than words. Their actions demonstrate that they don't really want equality or freedom, which begs the question - do they even know what freedom is?
As of late, I have noticed that many of those groups do not achieve what their founders set off to do. I am fairly certain that the founders' intentions are noble. They genuinely care about women. I don't think they have hidden agendas and I don't think their personal gain is substantial. Naturally, the group's intentions are clear, it's motivation obvious, but the application is flawed because it's goal is diluted. Such groups have become jaded about some of the deeply seeded issues facing women today. Hence, the distorted version of freedom and equality.
I think freedom comes with responsibilities. And these women want the freedom without the responsibilities. They don't really want to be equals. How many of them believe that it's a man's responsibility to solely provide before and after marriage, whereas it's optional for women? How many of them believe that it's okay to work within the confines of the prison that they have created for themselves? How many of them believe that they have the right to manipulate men? How many of them believe that women should be able to choose their line of work freely, but at the same time believe that there should be special conditions for women who need to go home early so they don't walk home late at night? How many of them believe that a women is entitled to a good home and money that is to be supplied by the husband? How many of them demand that women be free to travel without a man, yet shun other women who actually do it?
This is not equality. This is special treatment. It's very similar to the whole gay issue in North America. In my opinion, many gay organizations that call for the rights of gays have done a great disservice to the cause. Gay organizations want special treatment; they want special protection under the law, so that if a crime is committed against someone who is gay then it automatically becomes a hate crime. This is why there has been a lot of resistance to pass laws that support gay people. It's not because the average Joe hates gays. On the contrary, he has nothing against gays, but it's because those organizations are asking for impossibilities. Isn't any violent crime a hate crime? Is a gay man's life somehow worth more than a straight man's life? We have similar problems with racial crimes. When a white man kills a black man the first assumption is that it is a hate crime because it is racially motivated. Similarly, I think these women want special treatment under the law.
In the past, I have dealt with members of many organizations that call for women's rights. Initially, I encountered problems. Communication breakdown was primarily responsible for those problems. It was as if I was on a different wavelength altogether. I was often told that what I say is "unclear" or doesn't make sense. An Egyptian friend of mine once said...
The premise that women deserve better because they have been abused for so long and that somehow this entitles them to more is a very limited, perhaps even myopic, view of the issues surrounding women's rights. Women do not deserve better but are entitled to the same rights as everyone else, and that includes all the responsibilities that are an extension of those rights. To separate the two would be foolish. Those groups inadvertently demonize men while disregarding that women's contributions are part of what makes patriarchal societies flourish.
As women, our ability to empathize puts us at a most advantageous position to negotiate our disagreements and misunderstandings. Our ability to carry offspring within us provides us with an opportunity to connect; it does not give us the right to manipulate, threaten, and withhold. Our ability to raise children is our chance to leave a strong legacy; it does not give us the right to dictate who those children should be. Our sexual appeal is a positive method of communication; it does not give us the right to control and dominate.
It is one of my dreams, and perhaps an unattainable one, that all Egyptian women are set free. But before they demand freedom from those who keep them restrained, they have to free themselves from within first.
The fundamental lesson here: Freedom is not given. It is taken.
I often marvel at the number of mothers, daughters, and sisters who talk about what they deserve as a right yet revel in playing the damsel in distress. They blame their inability to achieve what they want on the unchallenged authority of the men in their family. I believe that where there's a will, there's a way. Think of yourself as a victim and you will always be one. We make our own dreams; we set our own goals. We know our strengths and our shortcomings. Anyone can do anything if they set their mind to it. I have done this time and time again. I am not special nor are the other strong women I know. Overcoming the traumas we experience in our life is part of living. Victory doesn't come in just one flavour. Defeat is only momentary. It is fear of defeat and thus the lack of trying that keeps those women subdued.
At best, the Egyptian Jane (or Laila, as many would like to refer to her) seems lost and confused. At worst, she is being misled by a variety of women's movements and groups who claim to support women but do very little for them. I can't say that they are all evil, and I realize that I am not obligated to help but I actually believe in women's rights and if those organizations can manage to bring about change then I want to do my part to make that dream come true. Still, I have been told that such groups won't affect much because they don't even know what they want. At first I thought that as the case with any cause when it starts, there is a lot of vagueness and a general direction without a focused mission. I thought that perhaps with time, things will become clear. Unfortunately, some of those groups have been around for a while without any indication that they have come any closer to figuring out what their goals are and how to achieve them.
After much thought, I have come to believe that in this case, time is not a factor. We have people who are leading those movements into a sort of regression without even realizing it. For instance, many of them call for freedom and equality between women and men. Their actions, however, speak louder than words. Their actions demonstrate that they don't really want equality or freedom, which begs the question - do they even know what freedom is?
As of late, I have noticed that many of those groups do not achieve what their founders set off to do. I am fairly certain that the founders' intentions are noble. They genuinely care about women. I don't think they have hidden agendas and I don't think their personal gain is substantial. Naturally, the group's intentions are clear, it's motivation obvious, but the application is flawed because it's goal is diluted. Such groups have become jaded about some of the deeply seeded issues facing women today. Hence, the distorted version of freedom and equality.
I think freedom comes with responsibilities. And these women want the freedom without the responsibilities. They don't really want to be equals. How many of them believe that it's a man's responsibility to solely provide before and after marriage, whereas it's optional for women? How many of them believe that it's okay to work within the confines of the prison that they have created for themselves? How many of them believe that they have the right to manipulate men? How many of them believe that women should be able to choose their line of work freely, but at the same time believe that there should be special conditions for women who need to go home early so they don't walk home late at night? How many of them believe that a women is entitled to a good home and money that is to be supplied by the husband? How many of them demand that women be free to travel without a man, yet shun other women who actually do it?
This is not equality. This is special treatment. It's very similar to the whole gay issue in North America. In my opinion, many gay organizations that call for the rights of gays have done a great disservice to the cause. Gay organizations want special treatment; they want special protection under the law, so that if a crime is committed against someone who is gay then it automatically becomes a hate crime. This is why there has been a lot of resistance to pass laws that support gay people. It's not because the average Joe hates gays. On the contrary, he has nothing against gays, but it's because those organizations are asking for impossibilities. Isn't any violent crime a hate crime? Is a gay man's life somehow worth more than a straight man's life? We have similar problems with racial crimes. When a white man kills a black man the first assumption is that it is a hate crime because it is racially motivated. Similarly, I think these women want special treatment under the law.
In the past, I have dealt with members of many organizations that call for women's rights. Initially, I encountered problems. Communication breakdown was primarily responsible for those problems. It was as if I was on a different wavelength altogether. I was often told that what I say is "unclear" or doesn't make sense. An Egyptian friend of mine once said...
You speak a different language altogether. I do not mean English, Arabic or such. You speak a cerebral language. They are more into the "touchy, feely" approach. You are a person who will get out of her way to achieve what she believes in; they are seeking relief in venting.
Laila is an emotional , timid, young girl who is restive under society's heavy-handed control, yet dreads being called defiant or recalcitrant. She will talk the talk, and will be content with limited success. I think she seeks relief and some measure of change but nothing audacious or earth shattering. Dont expect her to take drastic measures or to reinvent herself. The risks and costs are too great for her to do that. Yes, she is emotionally and socially stunted, and will produce another generation of slightly less stunted daughters. Change will not come at an exponential rate.
I have grave doubts about the effectiveness of [those groups]. Their goals aim mainly to collect and document testimonies and personal histories as a form of self expression and to raise awareness. Nowhere do they state where do they envisage going from there, who exactly is their target group, nor how far do they see the ripples of their 'movement' affecting the larger society. The intention is noble, the need great, but it can only skim the surface...they are only talking amongst themselves.
The premise that women deserve better because they have been abused for so long and that somehow this entitles them to more is a very limited, perhaps even myopic, view of the issues surrounding women's rights. Women do not deserve better but are entitled to the same rights as everyone else, and that includes all the responsibilities that are an extension of those rights. To separate the two would be foolish. Those groups inadvertently demonize men while disregarding that women's contributions are part of what makes patriarchal societies flourish.
As women, our ability to empathize puts us at a most advantageous position to negotiate our disagreements and misunderstandings. Our ability to carry offspring within us provides us with an opportunity to connect; it does not give us the right to manipulate, threaten, and withhold. Our ability to raise children is our chance to leave a strong legacy; it does not give us the right to dictate who those children should be. Our sexual appeal is a positive method of communication; it does not give us the right to control and dominate.
It is one of my dreams, and perhaps an unattainable one, that all Egyptian women are set free. But before they demand freedom from those who keep them restrained, they have to free themselves from within first.
The fundamental lesson here: Freedom is not given. It is taken.
6 comments:
I found this post really touching, and it expressed how i've felt about many movements in Egypt. The women are imprisoning themselves, and often times the worst cruelties come from within. How can you expect anybody to take you seriously when you aren't willing to get off your ass and accept the responsibilities that come with equality?
I myself have gone through this struggle to free myself from the years upon years during which i was taught about the responsibilities that women and men have. I really appreciate what you shared here, thanks.
Interesting post but I was disappointed to see your characterization of hate crime laws. The goal of hate crime laws is not to get "special" rights for gay people (or racial minorities) but to penalize a criminal who has attacked an individual (or business) with the goal of intimidating, harassing and demonstrating hatred for the other members of that community. So if a gang of thugs target Asians for attacks, the sentence should reflect that their aim was racist. Similarly, if someone targets a Muslim or Jewish place of worship, the sentence should not be just related to the property damage, but should reflect the harm done to the people who worshipped there and to other members of the community. Or, if a gay man is attacked on the street for holding hands with another man, that should be treated as a hate crime - because certainly it could happen to any gay man, and the intent was to attack and cause fear in the group as a whole. I have read that in Canada there have been relatively few hate crime prosecutions under section 319; most of the cases I recall reading about involve white supremacists. I think the law is completely appropriate, and reflects a desire to not tolerate attacks on minority groups of all kinds.
Hate crime laws are definitely a contentious issue but in the long term I think they are likely do more harm than good. Such laws tend to characterize certain crimes as more "criminal" as other identical crimes with the only distinctions being the identity of the victim and the perceived motivation of the perp. Such laws are frequently cited as violations of two of the most important concepts associated with freedom - free speech & equality before the law. I won't even get into the whole "thought police" argument that hate crime laws seem to open up in the minds of the more paranoid among us. I think these kind of laws tend to divide us more than they unite us so I just can't get behind them.
Why don't you say that it indicates thinking confusion for women -nearly- at my age?..
I' afraid to say that 100 years ago when our grandmothers were suddenly free, after the haramlek locking, they were more determined than we are now.
The social status right now is vague ya Wandering. You don't really know if its a conservative society or liberal one.. definitions are not clear for my generation. Be it for women rights wala freedom all together.
Like, when you talk with a low standard man about democracy. He might go along with u in the talk for a little bit, agree with you a little bit, and at most he will nod his head and leave.
I mean, my explaination might seem naive, but we haven't lived real democracy to imagine how it can be applied, same as women freedom, or women rights.. or women whatever.
We've lived with our conservative families, and at the same time heard stories about single mothers, violence against women, rape, treating women as sex objects.. etc, in the west.
Decision is hard. To know exactly which society you want to belong to, and you can 100% advocate for.. is hard, if not impossible to make.. Thats mainly why you hear voices calling for a mix between what is good here, and there. Because both societies are not women's perfect place yet.
Hope I made my point clear, and thanks for the post I enjoyed reading..
Anonymous #2.. I never said that "the goal of hate crime laws" is to get special treatment. The special treatment I was referring to, is demanding protection under the law for gay people, and similarly women.
In any case, please take a look at Anonymous #3's statement: "Such laws tend to characterize certain crimes as more "criminal" as other identical crimes with the only distinctions being the identity of the victim and the perceived motivation of the perp." This really nails it. My opinion is in line with that statement.
@Lasto adri *Blue*
Your comment aroused both my interest & my curiosity. I presume that you are a member of the younger generation of Egyptian women who have chosen to willingly pick up what their great grandmothers have fought to discard. Our grandmothers were not "suddenly freed" from the 'haramlek', they struggled, demonstrated, and were even shot at, to break taboos & gain some of those same rights their granddaughters have let go of. As WS stated, this was freedom that was earned, not granted or ceded easily.
I agree with you that there is a lot of "confusion" involved. I admit that I too, feel preplexed by this whole issue of "confusion"; therefore, allow me to address my questions to you, as a member of this 'Laila' generation : Why are you confused, about what exactly, and what do you intend to do about it? You mentioned 'social status', 'low standard ' ( I assume you are refering to socio-economic class?), women's rights in the West,and democracy. My take is that it has more to do with self- and world-views. There are no perfect societies, at least not in this world, and decisions about how to live one's life should not be informed by second hand stories & tales. So, tell me young Laila of Egypt, who exactly are you ( not meant as literal personal question) ? What rights and freedoms do you want for yourself and why do you want them? Where do you see yourself standing vis a vis the wider society you are a member of? How do you want to live your life?
Post a Comment